1823118230
News
4692019-01-31 01:58:03
Oh.
This is true, but in my opinion it's less noticeable in certain works of yours. It's something I'm noticing is happening more in more of your newer work.
That's a shame, but understandable.
True.
I merely pointed out how I feel about it, which is just disinterest. It doesn't mean I'm necessarily frustrated. "Subjectivity" is part of the "thoughts" you asked for. Of course a lot of my points were subjective, I went out of my way a lot of times to say "Imo, or in my opinion", and even saying my next statement is purely subjective. I mean you're asking for thoughts, normally that includes opinions.
Good luck on the flash though. Also I've been watching your stuff and commenting for many many years, if I was ONLY interested in Sixten, I wouldn't have started watching or continuing to watch your content.
Rock Candy1823218231
News
4692019-01-31 03:35:16
I've been trying to elaborate on facial expressions lately, that's probably why. Earlier flashes either had a linear looping animation, one set expression with simple blinking or a slideshow of randomly picked expressions, as seen in RR. My latest flash has had the most elaborate facial expressions, with both transitional animations and a huge variety of different expressions. I can understand if my attempt at making them stand apart from each other makes the eyes look inconsitent sometimes. But I've also tried to give each character of mine an unique set of eyes and I'm in the middle of figuring out how to animate them.
Fair enough, but what I meant and disagreed with was you decided that Sixten was the star of the flash, which you seemed to base your points on. It's fine to prefer Sixten's scene, that's why it's there, but you shouldn't hold it up as the main scene.
Well in either case, hope you'll like whatever the future enholds.
This is a reply to a comment and its comment thread.
Parent comment: 18230