1822718226
News
4692019-01-31 01:06:50
None of what I posted was "flimsy", they were your words. But that's completely fair in regards to your explanation.
In regards to the newer artstyle, I said "some" of your newer stuff looks wonky, not "all". It does in my opinion, weird anatomy, and faces being misaligned, inconsistent eye shapes/sizes, that kinda thing.
For the story that's pretty simple, as I simply commented on the lack of choice. Choice eliminates this problem of including new characters as you could choose which route happened previously (So Zu's or Sixten's). I thought I made that pretty clear. I also know you don't want to do this, but I'm just reiterating my response to this.
I'm not frustrated in the slightest. Having a discussion doesn't frustrate me, you asked for people to post my thoughts, and I have. I've been civil the entire time, pointing out why I had the perspective I did, and you kept replying so I figured you wanted to know what I had to say. Both in regards to being dismissive about what I had to say, with comments like "urjustgay", and saying now that I'm "frustrated", is silly and uncalled for. (Maybe it's because I capitalized words to emphasize things? Tone is hard to tell online)
That's completely fair in regards to what you said, I understand what you mean now that you've properly elaborated on what this is as a project. I have no issue with it specifically, it just seemed like a bad sequel and I pointed out why I thought that.
Rock Candy1823018227
News
4692019-01-31 01:50:31
I said my own comments were flimsy.
As an amateur artist, all of my works have inconsistencies and weird anatomy. RR is riddled with problems like these too, though.
I guess, but in either case I have no plans for making a real sequel to RR.
Well, you're not going to bother to look at the flash, so you won't know if the tie in is good or bad.
It seemed like that, though. Saying that you wouldn't even bother with it because it doesn't have Sixten in it makes you sound upset about it. And your points were rather subjective.
Oh well.
1823118230
News
4692019-01-31 01:58:03
Oh.
This is true, but in my opinion it's less noticeable in certain works of yours. It's something I'm noticing is happening more in more of your newer work.
That's a shame, but understandable.
True.
I merely pointed out how I feel about it, which is just disinterest. It doesn't mean I'm necessarily frustrated. "Subjectivity" is part of the "thoughts" you asked for. Of course a lot of my points were subjective, I went out of my way a lot of times to say "Imo, or in my opinion", and even saying my next statement is purely subjective. I mean you're asking for thoughts, normally that includes opinions.
Good luck on the flash though. Also I've been watching your stuff and commenting for many many years, if I was ONLY interested in Sixten, I wouldn't have started watching or continuing to watch your content.
Rock Candy1823218231
News
4692019-01-31 03:35:16
I've been trying to elaborate on facial expressions lately, that's probably why. Earlier flashes either had a linear looping animation, one set expression with simple blinking or a slideshow of randomly picked expressions, as seen in RR. My latest flash has had the most elaborate facial expressions, with both transitional animations and a huge variety of different expressions. I can understand if my attempt at making them stand apart from each other makes the eyes look inconsitent sometimes. But I've also tried to give each character of mine an unique set of eyes and I'm in the middle of figuring out how to animate them.
Fair enough, but what I meant and disagreed with was you decided that Sixten was the star of the flash, which you seemed to base your points on. It's fine to prefer Sixten's scene, that's why it's there, but you shouldn't hold it up as the main scene.
Well in either case, hope you'll like whatever the future enholds.
This is a reply to a comment and its comment thread.
Parent comment: 18226